Maternity Care Deserts: A Puzzling Problem in the World’s Richest Nation

“How women and infants are treated tells you a lot about a society.”

Kathleen Dowd, MSN, CNM, NP, Founder and Former President of the California Nurse-Midwives Foundation

According to a new report released by the March of Dimes, the crisis of maternity care deserts is critical, with 1 in 3 US counties without birth services. Maternity care deserts are most common in rural areas, with 2.4 million women and 149,000 infants living without services today. In this article, we’ll unpack the contributing factors that have led to this problem and discuss solutions with a maternal health policy expert and nurse leader.

What is Maternity Desert?

A maternity care desert is an area that has no obstetrics clinicians or birthing facilities. This issue is part of a broader, spiraling rural healthcare crisis that has led to 200 hospitals closing, in whole or in part, since 2005. 

The issue has worsened over the past twenty years, driven by multiple contributing factors. The lack of access to care is especially concerning when you place it in the context of the US’s poor maternal and infant health outcomes that have been worsening for years, which are the worst in the industrialized world. March of Dimes released its new report, “Nowhere To Go: Maternity Care Deserts Across the US,” in August of 2026, and what it showed was deeply concerning: 

  • More than 50 percent of US counties lack a hospital with labor and delivery services 
  • Ninety-six labor and delivery units closed across 35 states between 2024 and 2026
  • Nearly six million women and 358,000 infants have limited access to maternity care nationwide
  • Residents in these care deserts travel 3x longer to reach birth services 
  • Nearly two out of three maternal deaths in the US occur in the postpartum period 
  • The US has the least support for women in the postpartum period, such as home visits or guaranteed paid maternal leave, which are common in other industrialized nations

A Complex Problem

How can the richest country in the world have such poor health outcomes for mothers and infants? How did we get here? We spoke with Kathleen Dowd, MSN, CNM, NP, founder and former president of the California Nurse-Midwives Foundation and former president of the California Nurse-Midwives Association, to find out. 

“How women and infants are treated tells you a lot about a society. Rural medicine has historically been seen as a public service to invest in, not a moneymaker. Rural medicine has historically been seen as a public service to invest in, not a moneymaker. Today, unless the care of women and babies is profitable, it will not exist. Healthcare is a for-profit business,” Dowd says.

High Costs & Low Reimbursement 

Several factors compound the issue of rural hospital closures, and labor and delivery units in particular. First, because the US operates a for-profit healthcare model, where care is not guaranteed as a human right or a publicly funded service, hospitals are mostly paid on a fee-for-service basis. The more services rendered, the higher the reimbursement, which heavily favors facilities in highly populated urban areas and hits rural centers hard. This issue is made worse by the fact that 47 percent of rural maternity patients are on Medicaid, which reimburses hospitals significantly less than private insurers. 

These numbers are particularly hard for labor and delivery units to overcome, as they require specially trained staff and equipment to be available 24/7, costs which add up quickly. 

Decreasing Birth Rates

Another issue that is contributing to the growth of maternity deserts is the fact that birth rates are down across the board in the US, reaching an all-time low according to the Centers for Disease Control. Again, this issue hits rural centers harder and compounds. This is a trend that has been worsening for 20 years, but the Trump regime’s war on immigrants has accelerated it even further. 

Workforce Shortages/Distribution  

US healthcare leadership has long claimed there is a serious nursing shortage in the US. Thankfully, the truth is coming out: there are many more licensed nurses than open nursing roles, and that we actually have a shortage of nurses willing to work in unsafe, miserable conditions.

But one area of US healthcare that does actually suffer from workforce shortages is rural health. Nurses and doctors are distributed unequally nationwide, with many preferring to live and work in urban areas rather than rural ones for a few reasons.

While rural physicians tend to get paid more than their city counterparts, nurses and all other support staff get paid less. Rural facilities also tend to have fewer resources and amenities, and often have poorer health outcomes, so the patient acuity is higher. Smaller staff often means longer hours, more on-call time for specialists, and less support. Overall, rural healthcare is highly demanding, and nurses, in particular, are declining requests to do more with fewer resources and less pay. “Clinicians are stretched thinner and thinner each year,” Dowd says.  

Structural Inequities 

Lastly, all of these barriers to care for patients in rural healthcare add up over time and are seen in the poorer health outcomes experienced by rural patients. One study published in the American Journal of Public Health showed that rural mothers had an 81 percent higher rate of maternal mortality and a 14 percent higher risk for an ICU admission than their urban counterparts. 

Due to the lack of healthcare facilities, high rates of poverty, low rates of insurance, and healthcare workforce shortages, patients in rural areas overall experience worse health outcomes, and this very much includes mothers and infants.

Racist Historical Origins Worsened by Modern Politics

While many of the healthcare policies discussed so far developed in the recent past, some experts say other foundational issues require looking further back in history. In particular, it’s important to look back to the early 1900s, when the modern healthcare establishment was taking shape in the US.

First, it’s crucial to understand that, for most of history, midwives oversaw births. Women who learned the art and science of assisting in childbirth from more experienced instructors. This was true in the US as well, until physicians decided they threatened their business. “For a long time, Black enslaved women–known as granny midwives–served as midwives both for the Black women in their community, as well as poor white women in rural America. They delivered the majority of babies in rural areas,” Dowd says. 

In 1908, the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching hired former high school teacher Abraham Flexner to audit all medical schools across the country and make recommendations. The report was a scathing rebuke of countless institutions that Flexner believed were subpar and recommended standardizing U.S. medical education. 

After the Flexner report was published in 1910, its impacts were significant and far-reaching. Many medical schools closed, higher educational standards were implemented, and a more standardized curriculum began to take shape. 

But the report’s impact didn’t end there. Flexner, like most white professionals of the day, harbored deeply racist and sexist views, and the report also resulted in five of the seven Black medical schools in the country being closed. The report also recommended that Black doctors have their education limited to hygiene only and for women to be excluded from medical education altogether. This one report resulted in Black men and women being pushed out of the medical field for decades. 

It also spawned a whole movement in medical education that reverberated through many professions for the next century. Empowered by this movement, the field of obstetrics and gynecology set its sights on the group it viewed as enemy number one: granny midwives. 

In 1915, the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology launched a smear campaign against Black midwives, accusing them of being “dirty,” “superstitious,” and “incompetent.” This effort continued unchecked for decades, and by the 1970s, nearly all Black midwives had been forced out of practice and replaced with a small number of white midwives, a group that had demonstrated total fealty to the medical model and was completely fine with their position of subservience to the white male doctors.  

The State of Midwifery Today

While it’s clear that the causes of maternity care deserts are multi-factorial and require a multi-pronged approach (chiefly switching to a Universal Healthcare Model), the potential role of midwives as a solution to the rural care crisis should not be overlooked. “There is a lot of misogyny and racism at the root of the maternity care crisis we’re facing today,” Dowd says.  

It’s hard to argue with that, especially since developed nations worldwide use midwives at much higher rates than the US. For example, midwives deliver about half of all babies in the UK, and 75 percent of births in Denmark, Sweden, and France, compared to the mere 10 percent of midwife deliveries in the US. This is strange because certified nurse midwives have been shown to provide equal or better maternal and neonatal outcomes and quality measures than their physician counterparts. 

Despite the evidence and dire need of women and infants in maternal care deserts, the American medical establishment remains firmly in opposition to the expansion of midwifery practice because, then as now, midwives are viewed as financial competition. 

Dowd says, “In California, Midwives were not able to prescribe medication or order labs independently until 2020, when the Covid-19 pandemic led to a loosening of those restrictions. Insurance companies discriminate so much against reimbursing midwives for the care they provide. We’ve been working tirelessly on this in California, but it’s been incredibly difficult to initiate change.”

The Future of Maternity Care in Rural America

The slow, intractable nature of change in US healthcare policy is old news to anyone who works in the field. As long as financial incentives remain as they are, healthcare as a commodity to be sold for the highest profit margins and maximum shareholder value, the likelihood that the maternal crisis will be addressed meaningfully is slim. 

But birth professionals like Kathleen Dowd fiercely fight on anyway. Beyond advocating for the expansion of midwifery practice, Dowd says they are experimenting with new care models: “Here in California, we are coming up with alternative models in rural areas with birth centers, so we’re working with small rural hospitals to train general surgeons on how to do C-sections. Another option is for family medicine doctors to complete a fellowship so they can perform C-sections as well. It’s not ideal, but we have to act to bridge these gaps for moms and babies.”

Meg Lambrych, RN

Meg Lambrych, RN

Writer

Meg Lambrych is a registered nurse, writer, and nursing advocate from Upstate New York.

After leaving clinical care due to burnout, she dedicated her life to covering issues in healthcare, nursing, and health in the digital space. She reports on nursing culture, policy, and history and interviews nursing innovators and leaders shaping the profession and challenging the status quo.